My Favourite Discussions
http://mojoey.blogspot.com/2007/08/blogroll-update-rule-change.html
Sample: “I guess this should have been obvious. To be on the Atheist Blogroll, one must be an Atheist or an Agnostic. A loophole in the rules allowed freethinking deist Agradevaduta to join. The loophole is closed. The Atheist blogroll represents Atheist and Agnostic bloggers. Agradevaduta has been removed from the blogroll.”
http://mojoey.blogspot.com/2007/08/blogroll-update-do-we-vote-agradevaduta.html
Sample: “This is a toughie. If sincere, Archangel’s arguments here I think warrant him staying. I for one see no problem with an agnostic theorizing a laundry list of “what ifs” about the existence of a deity and following one of those down the rabbit hole. It’s a good exercise.”
http://blog.case.edu/mxs24/2007/03/29/god_in_the_supermarket
Sample: “…While the believer’s conclusions reside in the notion of faith which is devoid of logical reasoning, the atheist himself relies on the infallibility of his own powers of empirical investigation…. Human beings and the science they have created (yes, the same science you seem to believe in with understandable passion and base your arguments entirely upon) remain within a transitory vacuum, since human beings are bound to evolve into a more intelligent and perceptive species. It grows ominously clear that Science as it now exists cannot necessarily be accepted as truth. I speak not of the constant amendment of scientific truth as we develop as a species, but rather the complete overhaul of science as we know it when human beings evolve into a more advance species…”
http://negligibleminoritist.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/questioning-neosexism/
Sample: “…Just to comment on your views on equality amongst men and women, I must say agree with you completely. However, there is one conceptual difficulty you seem to have got yourself entangled in. It is the independence between the two concepts equality and the freedom of expression. To put things simply and avoid verbosity, it means that men and women ARE (as in a current state of being) equal. Thus the views of one group of individuals will not impinge on equality. Equality resides in reality, not in recognition. The true notion of equality is however strongly questioned when women complain about treatment men would not under ordinary circumstances complain about. It’s time women embrace their equality rather than expect men to recognize and respect it for them…”
http://mojoey.blogspot.com/2007/04/more-on-how-to-win-car-on-easter.html
Sample: “…I must clarify that I am talking strictly in terms of a framework of belief and how actions can be justified if one’s belief is such. The question is not whether the Christian is right or wrong in providing incentives in his efforts as a “fisher of men”, or protesting at abortion clinics. The question is whether we should attempt to understand where these actions originate from. And my point is that this may be a misguided (as it may be the case) belief that the Christian is doing some long term good through what I may regard as a “shady” act i.e. dangling a car in front of a non-believer or intimidating a pregnant women who is about to abort. However, there is absolutely no point in criticizing someone who believes in all honesty that he is doing what he is charged by divine law to do. The belief itself may not always be justified. But the action may be justified if the belief truly exists…”
Agradevaduta 
“Thus, every atheist is utterly dependent on the fundamental presumption that science as a human product leads to empirical truth. Sounds like faith to me.”
Faith, my friend, is belief in things without any attempt at verification. Science is the organised body of knowledge concerning the physical world. It recognises that it is incomplete, and unlike religion, it constantly questions its results; it always tests its veracity. Therefore, there is nothing wrong in atheists basing their beliefs in empirical science. If science will someday discover god, the atheist position will cease to be. That, clearly, is nothing like faith.
Disco Bob requests that you blog on this subject, so that he can attack your position directly, instead of commenting obliquely on a comment you’ve made elsewhere. Or is it a subject where Archangel fears to tread further?
Peace people
We love you
they only wanna do you dir. Ondrej Manisha.
see it’s very define,your one of a kin. Huda Swithun.
Finding the right sports books and bookmakers to use for your arbitrage sports betting can be a daunting task with the internet now they are everywhere. The list of crooked bookmaking sites that have helped part people with their money and robbed them of their winnings grows longer every day. Being enlightened about this all sports bettors should do their due diligence before signing up with any bookmaker and be sure of their reputation as well as their guarantees on return of winnings. Almost all sports betting sites will have reviews so read them before making your decision on which one you go with.
Another way of identifying the best sports betting odds is to examine the money lines on the various sports books online. The quickest and simplest way to understand how to compute the odds and comprehend how the money line bet works is to take into consideration the amount of money one would have to bet in order to win one hundred dollars. Normally this figure is shown as a negative and a positive with the negative number indicating what one must wager to win x amount of dollars and the positive showing what one would win.
betting on sports
The Martingale System is probably the most famous sports betting system on the planet and actually has nothing to do with choosing the winner of an event but is more concerned with the right odds and money lines. It seems that the gist of the system is that it looks at the statistical probabilities of how many times in a row one may lose and is put into action by placing a bet and then betting again if you win.
The important thing to note here is that neither of the above approaches is “systemised”, although those in the first group believe that they are limiting losses while increasing their winning chances. But what the majority in that first group generally do not take proper account of is how the Bookies have fixed the odds to ensure that they, the Bookies, will come out on top in the long run. What this means is that if you only bet on “favourites” you will eventually lose all your money, although it is true that you will enjoy a much longer period of betting before you kiss your last buck goodbye!